Runyon & Runyon
  • "This little note is to say thanks for all you have done for me. You worked so hard to prove that we told the truth. However it turns out, I know you did your best."
  • "Thank you and the Runyon team for everything that you all have done for my son. I truly appreciate it."
  • "Thank you Mrs. Browning for all of your help, and if you could pass my thanks on to Ray. Your team helped more than you know. If you ever need to reach me for anything further ill be here.Thank you again."
  • " I can’t put into words how grateful I am for all you have done for me. Thank you for listening and understanding what I was going through...”
  • " Thank you for taking care of everything for me in a professional manner. The staff is awesome also!”
  • " I wanted to thank you for your support. You are the best attorney in Clarksville. I could not have done it without you”
  • " Should I need legal service again you will be my only one to call. Thank you so much”
  • " Ray took time out of his busy schedule to fit us in at a time of crisis on several occasions”
Read More
Contact Us For An Appointment
toll free 800-568-1534
local 931-305-0061

Is there a trend toward shared custody arrangements?

Our family law firm has observed a trend in child custody determinations toward shared arrangements. Considering that both parents may have to balance work and parenting obligations, it perhaps makes sense that no single parent is awarded primary custody. Yet a shared approach may require greater cooperation, as a recent case illustrates. 

In the case, the child custody dispute arose not during the divorce, but several years later, when the minor child reached the age of going to school full-time. Up until the point, the father had parented the child every Monday through Wednesday, as well as alternating weekends. However, the approach of the school year prompted the mother to go back to court, seeking a modification of the child custody order.

When personal circumstances change, a family law court may be open to considering modifications. In fact, the lower court in this story agreed with the mother’s assertion that the child should have a single residence during the school week in order to provide continuity and stability. The father would have custody only on the weekends during the school year, with shared custody in the summers. However, the state superior court vacated and remanded that order.

On appeal, the father asserted that multiple factors were enumerated under the state’s child custody law. One of those factors referenced providing continuity and stability in a child’s environment. The father asserted that the child had grown accustomed to the shared parenting arrangement, and a disruption to that care pattern would have been far more disruptive to the child than any inconvenience resulting from commuting.

Source: The Legal Intelligencer, “Primary Custody of Child Not Required During School Year,” Feb. 3, 2016 

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

We Have Answers

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy